Why did MIA leaders think a federal court case would be an effective second front to challenge segregation?
Answer:
The MIA leaders thought that a federal court case would be an effective second front to challenge segregation because they believed that the legal system could be used to strike down segregation laws.The Montgomery bus boycott demonstrated the effectiveness of direct action tactics, but MIA leaders also recognized that there were limitations to this strategy and that the ultimate goal was to change unjust laws. Therefore, they pursued legal strategies as well.The idea was to use the courts to challenge the constitutionality of segregation laws and policies. They hoped that the courts would rule in their favor and strike down segregation, leading to broader social change across the South and the rest of the country.Through legal action, the MIA leaders aimed to demonstrate that segregation violated the constitutional rights of African Americans, and that it was the duty of the federal government to intervene and protect those rights. They believed that a federal court case would be an effective way to achieve this goal.
More Questions And Answers:
- Which equation can be used to find the unknown length, a, in this triangle?
- Preparing to pay for higher education can start in 9th grade or earlier by
- Can i take 2 cyclobenzaprine 10mg at the same time?
- Word problem for 36 divided by 4
- Convert 86 degrees Fahrenheit to Celsius.
- The value of y is inversely proportional to the product of 4 and x squared.
- Preparing to pay for higher education can start in 9th grade or earlier by
- Are these ratios 36:3 and 24:4 are equivalent?
- What is 170 Degrees in Celsius to Fahrenheit?